Features/Industry & Policy Lab
Industry & Policy Lab

Industrial economics, built for practitioners.

From HHI and UPP to DID and DEA — every tool competition economists, regulators, and policy analysts need. Upload your data and get defensible results in minutes.

HHI · UPPDID · RDD · IVTFP · DEAMerger SimulationWelfare Analysis
Industry & Policy Lab — market structure and policy impact
35+
Analysis Methods
5
Sections
14
Categories
AI
Auto Interpretation

01 · STRUCTURE

How is the market built?

Define markets, measure concentration, assess entry.

Identify the relevant market with SSNIP-based tests and cross-price elasticity. Quantify market power with HHI, Lerner Index, and markup estimation. Detect barriers to entry and track firm entry and exit rates.

Market Definition
Market DefinitionCross-Price Elasticity
Market Power
HHI & ConcentrationLerner IndexMarkup EstimationLabor Monopsony
Entry & Exit
Entry BarriersEntry & Exit Rates

SUMMARY

Unconcentrated, competitive market

HHI 1451 · 8 entities · top entity 23% share

Entities

8

HHI

1451

CR4

64%

Top entity

Cola_A

Concentration · Revenue share

Cola_A
Cola_B
Cola_C
Juice_A
Lemon_A
Water_A
Juice_B
Water_B

Cross-price elasticity (top 5)

Q↓ / P→ColaAColaBColaCJuiceALemonA
ColaA-2.21-0.73-0.76-1.32-1.66
ColaB-2.00-1.08-1.30-1.52-1.58
ColaC-1.67-0.80-1.64-1.68-3.41
JuiceA-0.05-1.19-2.38-1.91-1.27
LemonA-0.87-0.78-1.19-0.87-1.00

02 · CONDUCT

How do firms behave?

Detect collusion, dominance abuse, and vertical restraints.

Screen for price parallelism and bid-rigging patterns. Quantify abuse of dominance with predatory pricing and price discrimination tests. Assess vertical integration and foreclosure risk.

Collusion
Price ParallelismBid Rigging
Dominance
Abuse of DominancePredatory PricingPrice Discrimination
Vertical
Vertical Integration

SUMMARY

Substantial pricing power detected

Mean Lerner 41.0% but only 67% of firms align with demand-implied benchmark

MEAN LERNER

41.0%

22 firms

DEMAND-IMPLIED

44.5%

1/|elasticity|

AGREEMENT RATE

67%

|est−theo| <10pp

CONDUCT THETA

1.02

0=Bertrand,1=Monopoly

Estimated vs demand-implied Lerner

Demand-Implied Lerner (%)Estimated (%)

03 · M&A

Will this merger harm competition?

Screen, simulate, and measure merger effects.

Apply ΔHHI, UPP, and diversion ratio tests to screen merger risk. Simulate post-merger prices with Logit-Bertrand. Measure stock market and price effects with event studies and difference-in-differences.

Screening
ΔHHI TestUPPDiversion Ratios
Simulation
Logit + Bertrand
Event Study
Event Study (Stock)DID on Prices

Scale Economies

Increasing returns to scale

η = 1.20 > 1: cost rises slower than output. Larger firms have a cost advantage.

α_Q = 0.834 (SE 0.013)

η = 1/α_Q = 1.199 → IRS

MES ≈ Q = 335 (AC = 2.18)

R² = 0.944

α_Q

0.834

SE 0.013

η=1/α_Q

1.199

IRS

MES (Q)

335

AC = 2.18

AC_max/AC_min

1.49

cost dispersion

Average Cost Curve (Mean AC by Q-bin)

MES0.851.72.553.4Output Q (log scale)

04 · POLICY

Did the policy work?

Causal identification — DID, RDD, IV, event study.

Estimate causal effects of regulations, subsidies, and trade policy using difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, and instrumental variables. Measure tax pass-through and price regulation impact.

Causal Methods
DIDEvent StudyRDDIV
Regulation
Tax/Subsidy Pass-throughPrice RegulationTrade Policy

Difference-in-Differences

PrePostATTControlTreatment

ATT

+12.1

p-value

0.003

Significant policy effect

05 · IMPACT

What are the economic effects?

Productivity, dynamics, linkages, and welfare.

Measure total factor productivity with Levinsohn-Petrin. Estimate scale economies and X-inefficiency with DEA. Track firm survival and reallocation. Quantify output and employment multipliers and welfare effects.

Productivity
TFP (Levinsohn-Petrin)Scale EconomiesX-Inefficiency (DEA)
Industry Dynamics
Firm SurvivalReallocation
Linkages & Multipliers
Output MultiplierEmployment Multiplier
Welfare
Consumer & Producer WelfareWage Premium

Median survival

4.9

periods

S(5) / S(10)

48.7%

/ 28.0%

Exits / Censored

357

/ 43 censored

Size HR

0.62

significant

Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve

By group; log-rank χ² = 63.57, p ≈ .000

0510152000.250.50.751Time
ControlTreatment

Hazard Rate

Period-by-period exit risk. Constant ⇒ exponential survival; rising ⇒ aging effect.

Defensible analysis, faster.

35+ methods. Upload your data and get publication-ready results in minutes.

No credit card required
35+ analysis methods